OVERLOOKED

United States·United States (Montana)

Montana's elections office warned of "historically high" ballot rejections without telling counties a judge had found the birth-year rule unconstitutional

Illustration: a stack of blank ballot envelopes on a wooden table by a window looking out on prairie and mountains at dusk
Illustration · OVERLOOKED
10O-Score10 · Fully overlooked0 of 13 major U.S. outlets by our publish date · See proof →
ScoreMeaningMajor U.S. outlets that covered it
10Fully overlooked ← this story0 of 13 outlets
8Barely covered1 outlet
6, 5Lightly covered2 outlets (6) · 3 outlets (5)
4, 3Covered4 outlets (4) · 5 outlets (3)
2, 1, 0Widely covered6–7 outlets (2) · 8–10 outlets (1) · 11–13 outlets (0)

Provisional: Google News (5 term variants for AP, Reuters and The Washington Post; 3 for the others) and Bing News (5 variants, outlet domain only) were both used. AP, Reuters and CBS News block direct site search, and the other 10 outlets’ site search only loads in a live browser. A single search engine can miss articles, so this score may go down on recheck.

Depth

Dig five layers into this story — from what happened to the full picture.

L1What happened

The update, obtained by MTFP through a records request placed with Missoula County, said "judicial changes of this nature can continue to evolve, and we do not know whether this ruling will be revisited" and warned "rejection rates could be historically high." It told counties: "For now, please do not consider birth years when processing absentee envelopes on Election Day." It did not say whether the state intended to appeal (MTFP).

L2Who’s affected

Absentee voters, who the judge noted made up more than three-quarters of voters in Montana's 2018 election, are affected. Lewis and Clark County Elections Administrator Connor Fitzpatrick said absentee voters should write their birth year "just in case." Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder Bret Rutherford said his understanding was based solely on the email, that he hadn't read the court order and wasn't aware the judge had found the requirement unconstitutional. Yellowstone County Elections Administrator Dayna Causby said her office will accept all ballots and won't segregate those without birth years (MTFP).

L3Why it’s quiet

Analysis · OVERLOOKED A state election-administration story surfaced through a county records request; the secretary of state's office did not answer MTFP's questions sent multiple times over two days. AP covered the ruling itself, but we saw no coverage of the advisory by the 13 major U.S. outlets.

L4Deeper impact

Trent Bolger of Big Sky 55+, a plaintiff: "The secretary of state's office could have cleared this up earlier. But they chose not to, and now they've decided to complain in an unprofessional manner." Betsy Brandborg of Friends of the Third Branch: "This is at best disrespectful. At worst, it demonstrates a lack of understanding of how democracy works." Elections and Voter Services Manager Sadie Dallaserra, who sent the email, called the plaintiffs, both headquartered in Helena, "DC groups" and wrote that the ruling means the office "can no longer proceed with the extensive outreach campaign" it had planned (MTFP).

L5Full context

District Judge Mike Menahan granted summary judgment to Big Sky 55+ and Disability Rights Montana on Oct. 2, finding that HB 719 failed middle-tier constitutional review and that the state had not provided evidence the requirement prevented election fraud; he enjoined enforcement, and the order did not limit the injunction to the 2026 general election. Under the law, in effect since July 2025, 1,814 absentee ballots went uncounted in the November 2025 municipal elections, against a prior statewide uncounted rate of half a percent; 2,855 were rejected in May school elections and 1,103 in the June primary (MTFP, citing the order and state figures).

You’ve reached the bottom. Read the original reporting below.

Original reporting

  1. Montana Free Press (Tom Lutey)Confusion remains over ballot requirement after secretary of state's guidanceNov 2, 2026 ↗
Status history (2 events, ET)
  1. O-Score check: 10 (Fully overlooked) · 0 of 13 outlets counted
  2. Published

ElectionsVoting rightsCourtsState politics

This is an OVERLOOKED summary of the reporting above. Facts and figures come from the linked sources. Everything here is a fact unless it is labelled otherwise. Support this work.

Alerts Get stories like this your way: email, a daily PDF paper, notifications, RSS, or alerts on topics you follow. Choose how →

← Filter all stories